Sunday, February 19, 2012

When Not If

One reason to attend the EAGC meeting Tuesday night, if you are interested, is to get a final look at the monument project and the timeline it will follow.  Rest assured, it isn't a matter of if the project will go forward, it is when and how.  Although the EAGC is advisory in nature only to the BOA, it is a done deal on whatever the committee recommends.  Why do I say that?  Alderman DeJong and Mayor Bos are up to their eyeballs on  the so-called Infrastructure SubCommittee which is the driving force of the EAGC.  All they need is one more alderman as a positive vote, likely Hoy or Folkedahl and it is a done deal with Bos breaking a tie if that happens.  Finn has been the only one skeptical at times of the project, but it is just one vote.

The biggest decision the EAGC has to make on Tuesday is the "how".  The original plan was to construct the City Hall monuments plus one each at Hillside and Forest.  Mostly because of Finn's questions, the inclusion of East Side and Barry in the first phase will be discussed...would make sense wouldn't it?

Speaking of "if", it seems that raising sufficient funds for the project is not a concern of the Committee, so I assume all the pledge(ers) are still on board.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

They better be onboard. Otherwise these guys will want to tax us, the taxpayers, for their folly.

Jackdaw Observer said...

The real folly is . . . this started with Kansas City compensating City of WL for the Eastside sign. . . there is no Eastside sign in the works.

"They better be onboard" ? ? ?
Or what?

There's no "or what".

Majority of WL citizens are happy with whatever is proposed or mandated by our city government.

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't this meeting appear on the city website calendar? How are people supposed to know about the meeting if they don't read this blog? Why did the city make such a large investment in updating the website if they don't use it to keep the community informed?

Anonymous said...

Seems to me there has been such a lack of support for the new signs, they are only focusing on those few with interest.

Not long ago we sat down with Mayor Bos over an issue. He spoke on such a childlike level, we couldn’t figure out if he was an idiot or if he thought he was pulling one over us or if he was playing dumb.

So when it comes to the signs, who knows what the true intentions are.

Anonymous said...

Playing dumb seems to be his forte-when can you tell he is just acting?

Anonymous said...

"They better be onboard. Otherwise these guys will want to tax us, the taxpayers, for their folly."

The real folly is running the city like a church or a club

This should be paid for by my taxes and yours

Those that dont want it that way want someone elses donation to pay for it